From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020524.html | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020524.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020524.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020524.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020524.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a0bf06876 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-December/020524.html @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Will the 'official' Mageia-3 installer have a 'GRUB Legacy' option? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Will the 'official' Mageia-3 installer have a 'GRUB Legacy' option?

+ Thomas Backlund + tmb at mageia.org +
+ Mon Dec 3 20:37:50 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
AL13N skrev 3.12.2012 21:25:
+> Op maandag 3 december 2012 18:01:28 schreef Maurice Batey:
+>> On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:51:52 +0100, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
+>>> If you have another distribution
+>>> installed with grub-legacy it is easy to install a second distro which
+>>> uses grub2 (use chainloader in your existing grub-legacy).
+>>
+>>    Depends on where GRUB2 is installed.
+>> If it goes in the MBR, then how does one get to existing GRUB-Legacy
+>> installs? (I do not know how to chainload from a GRUB2 menu to a
+>> GRUB-Legacy install, though I can from GRUB-Legacy to GRUB2).
+>>
+>> My experience with GRUB2 distros such as Ubuntu 12.01 and Mint 13 is that
+>> although their menus do include existing GRUB-Legacy installs, they fail to
+>> boot them.
+>>
+>> Apart from all that, I do not WANT to use GRUB2. Why is it needed?
+>>     As someone else said in here just now there is a vast difference between
+>> the simplicity of adjusting a GRUB-Legacy menu.lst and the ridiculous
+>> jumping through hoops required to do the equivalent in GRUB2.
+>>    And isn't it great that e.g. hd(0,0) in GRUB-Legacy is hd(0,1) in GRUB2?
+>> What was the point of that unbelieveble jumble?
+>
+> you are completly correct, however, grub-legacy hasn't been supported for
+> years, and grub2 has btrfs support...
+>
+
+yeah, well not supporting brtfs can be considered a + :)
+
+even btrfs has problem supporting btrfs at times :)
+
+--
+Thomas
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1