From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017863.html | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017863.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017863.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017863.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017863.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..02bdadd52 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017863.html @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release task-obsolete-3-21.mga3 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release task-obsolete-3-21.mga3

+ Thierry Vignaud + thierry.vignaud at gmail.com +
+ Wed Aug 1 16:17:53 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
On 1 August 2012 15:43, Guillaume Rousse <guillomovitch at gmail.com> wrote:
+>> Within mageia, libreoffice packages are supposed to replace old
+>> openoffice packages, so obsoletes are needed.
+>
+> Unless they are effective file conflict, and libreoffice can't be installed
+> simultaneously, I see no actual reason to force its removal.
+
+They do conflicts.
+We do not maintain it anymore.
+We do no want to have bugs reports about package Y on mgaX about
+packages "that were obviously build by mga" (yes but for mgaX-10).
+
+In that case, it's even worse, as it would have been a mdv package on mga
+after mdv->mga upgrade
+
+And anyway this is a different case than obsoleting a library (though I do
+understand Funda's move about libdb and his intents)
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1