From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014591.html | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014591.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014591.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014591.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014591.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f19d70ece --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014591.html @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] RPM groups change: Productivity ? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] RPM groups change: Productivity ?

+ Maarten Vanraes + alien at rmail.be +
+ Sat Apr 21 17:21:25 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
Op zaterdag 21 april 2012 07:33:23 schreef Remco Rijnders:
+> Hi all,
+> 
+> I've just submitted taskwarrior, a command line tool to organise,
+> prioritise, and track tasks etc.
+> 
+>  From the Fedora spec which I adopted, they have it in the group
+> "Applications/Productivity". We have no such group available on
+> https://wiki.mageia.org/en/RPM_groups_policy . In the end I resorted to
+> picking "Text tools", but it just didn't feel right to me. As I have
+> similar tools I'm thinking of packaging, as well as we have other tools
+> in the distro such as taskcoach in "Office", I think a "Productivity"
+> category might be of use. What do you think?
+> 
+> Remmy
+
+Since our license policy is fedora based, i see no problem with this group 
+policy change
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1