From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014146.html | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014146.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014146.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014146.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014146.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c223af8b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014146.html @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] nvidia + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] nvidia

+ Anssi Hannula + anssi at mageia.org +
+ Wed Apr 11 16:35:39 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
07.04.2012 14:17, Thomas Backlund kirjoitti:
+> 07.04.2012 03:41, Pascal Terjan skrev:
+>> Hi,
+>>
+>> regarding http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/tmb/dependencies.html do you
+>> know if nvidia173/kmod-nvidia173 and nvidia-96xx/kmod-nvidia96xx should
+>> be obsoleted by something (nouveau?)?
+>>
+> 
+> Well,
+> 
+> kmod-nvidia96xx/173 and the matching nvidia*kernel*latest can simply be
+> nuked from the repos as they are Cauldron only packages
+> 
+> So it leaves theese:
+> dkms-nvidia96xx
+> nvidia96xx-devel
+> nvidia96xx-doc-html
+> x11-driver-video-nvidia96xx
+> 
+> dkms-nvidia173
+> nvidia173-cuda
+> nvidia173-devel
+> nvidia173-doc-html
+> x11-driver-video-nvidia173
+> 
+> I guess the dkms-nvidia96xx/173 packages should be obsoleted by kernel,
+> and the x11-driver-video-nvidia96xx/173 should be obsoleted by
+> x11-driver-video-nouveau.
+
+Either that or add conflicts to X11 server, I guess.
+
+> Hmmm, do we need triggers to handle gl.conf for nvidia like we need for
+> fglrx ?
+> 
+> Anssi, wdyt ?
+
+harddrake_service should already change the driver if ldetect-lst
+indicates so.
+
+
+>> I don't know anything about nvidia but internet says 173 and 96xx are
+>> not compatible with x11-server 1.11
+>> Compatibility with 1.10 was added in the latest version, in August last
+>> year, 6 months after 1.10 was released, and a week before 1.11 was
+>> released. It has now been more than 6 months since 1.11 was released,
+>> 1.12 was released last month, so should we still expect 1.11 (and recent
+>> kernels) support to happen?
+> 
+> It does not really seem like nVidia will support them, but I can be wrong...
+> 
+> Anssi ?
+
+I don't have any additional information, but I wouldn't rule new
+releases out, there have been long delays previously as well...
+
+-- 
+Anssi Hannula
+
+ + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1