From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014087.html | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014087.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014087.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014087.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014087.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9eb039de5 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/014087.html @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] icewm-gnome: is it still supported? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] icewm-gnome: is it still supported?

+ Funda Wang + fundawang at gmail.com +
+ Tue Apr 10 05:54:27 CEST 2012 +

+
+ +
I guess you are talking about ditch specific package from user's
+system. Check it here:
+https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Packaging_guidelines#Obsoleting_a_package
+
+2012/4/10 You-Cheng Hsieh <yochenhsieh at gmail.com>:
+> 2012/4/5 Olav Vitters <olav at vitters.nl>:
+>> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:47:33AM +0800, You-Cheng Hsieh wrote:
+>>> Is icewm-gnome still usable in cauldron? I have to install many gnome2
+>>> libraries in order to build it, but I cannot get it working. On the
+>>> other hand, gnome2 libraries are not maintained by upstream...
+>>>
+>>> Should we provide it for Mageia 2?
+>>
+>> Suggest drop it unless it is ported to not use those old libraries (lots
+>> of functionality has been replaced by things in gtk+, etc). Don't forget
+>> that if you import, you're the maintainer ;)
+>>
+> I've set %define with_gnome 0 in icewm.spec locally, icewm-gnome won't be built.
+> Should I set Obsoletes: %{name}-gnome for icewm-light?
+> Does icewm-gnome need to be removed during update/upgrade if we drop it?
+>
+> Thanks.
+
+ + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1