[Mageia-dev] protobuf package problem

Thu May 26 00:34:12 CEST 2011

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 23:30, Dexter Morgan <dmorganec at gmail.com> wrote:
+> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Pascal Terjan <pterjan at gmail.com> wrote:
+>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 16:05, Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
+>>> 'Twas brillig, and Dexter Morgan at 20/05/11 14:21 did gyre and gimble:
+>>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dexter Morgan <dmorganec at gmail.com> wrote:
+>>>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
+>>>>>> 'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 20/05/11 11:22 did gyre and gimble:
+>>>>>>> To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed:
+>>>>>>>    Package                        Version      Release       Arch
+>>>>>>> (medium "CoreRelease-64")
+>>>>>>>   protobuf                       2.3.0        10.mga1       x86_64
+>>>>>>>   protobuf-compiler              2.3.0        10.mga1       x86_64
+>>>>>>> 1.6MB of additional disk space will be used.
+>>>>>>> 473KB of packages will be retrieved.
+>>>>>>> Proceed with the installation of the 2 packages? (Y/n)
+>>>>
+>>>> can you test new packages please ?
+>>>
+>>> Got it. Seems to work great. Thanks :D
+>>>
+>>
+>> Is it intended that most subpackages no longer exist and were not
+>> obsoleted (all the -10) ?
+>>
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.x86_64.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.x86_64.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/SRPMS/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-11.mga1.src.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-vim-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-static-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-lite-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-devel-2.3.0-10.mga1.i586.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-compiler-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-java-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/core/release/protobuf-javadoc-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm
+>> /distrib/bootstrap/distrib/cauldron/i586/media/debug/core/release/protobuf-debug-2.3.0-11.mga1.i586.rpm
+>>
+>
+> As this was a cauldron only issue i though this wasn't needed, do you
+> prefer them to be obsoleted ?
+> i can do it right now if needed.
+
+No but I won't remove them from mirrors if this is not normal, that's
+why I asked if it was intended
+