[Mageia-dev] [Bug 1016] No help in installer

Thu Apr 28 12:00:45 CEST 2011

Le jeudi 28 avril 2011 à 10:39 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit :
+> 2011/4/28 Thierry Vignaud <thierry.vignaud at gmail.com>:
+> > On 28 April 2011 10:08, Remco Rijnders <remco at webconquest.com> wrote:
+> >>> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1016
+> >>>
+> >>> D Morgan <dmorganec at gmail.com> changed:
+> >>>
+> >>>          What    |Removed                     |Added
+> >>>
+> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+> >>>        AssignedTo|bugsquad at mageia.org         |dmorganec at gmail.com
+> >>>                CC|                            |dmorganec at gmail.com
+> >>>
+> >>> --- Comment #1 from D Morgan <dmorganec at gmail.com> 2011-04-28 12:02:52
+> >>> CEST ---
+> >>> i started to work on it.
+> >>
+> >> Given our target audience and seeing how this is going to be our first full
+> >> release, perhaps this should be release blocking? WDYT?
+> >
+> > About the license issue, isn't that a non issue:
+> > $ rpm -qp --qf '%{license}\n'
+> > mandriva-doc-installer-help-2010.1-1.0mdv2010.1.noarch.rpm
+> > Open Publication License
+> >
+> > There's no additional restrictions neither in the package nor in its
+> > mandriva-doc SRPM
+> >
+> 
+> In documentation
+> 
+> "Copyright © 2009 Mandriva SA
+> 
+> This material may only be distributed subject to the terms and
+> conditions set forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later
+> (the latest version is presently available at opencontent.org).
+> 
+> Distribution of substantively modified versions of this document is
+> prohibited without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.
+> 
+> Distribution of the work or derivatives of the work in any standard
+> (paper) book form is prohibited unless prior permission is obtained
+> from the copyright holder."
+> 
+> 
+> When we had a look on it we discovered that it could be a full
+> copyleft license provided there is no restriction. Which is not the
+> case for Mandriva
+> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Publication_License. This has been
+> checked also with Neodoc who worked on it for years
+
+What about then a message stating that we didn't finished the cleaning
+in time and so on ?
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+