[Mageia-dev] dual iso content

Mon Apr 4 14:13:43 CEST 2011

2011/4/4 Thomas Lottmann <skipercooker at gmail.com>:
+> Le 04/04/2011 13:44, James Kerr a écrit :
+>>
+>> On 04/04/11 10:49, Donald Stewart wrote:
+>>>
+>>> On 4 April 2011 10:35, Anne nicolas<ennael at mageia.org> wrote:
+>>>>
+>>>> Hi there
+>>>>
+>>>> While working on beta1 isos, looks like recent improvement in deps
+>>>> management for base system made some more free space. I know have 30
+>>>> Mo available to add more packages. Just keep in mind that dual content
+>>>> is both 32 and 64 bits and focus on minimal installation and
+>>>> diagnostic tools
+>>>>
+>>>> Here is the current list:
+>>>> http://zarb.org/~ennael/mageia-dual-1-Beta1-dual.idx
+>>>>
+>>>> Feel free to comment
+>>>> Cheers
+>>>>
+>>>> --
+>>>> Anne
+>>>> http://www.mageia.org
+>>>>
+>>>
+>>> mc would be nice. Otherwise the list looks good.
+>>>
+>>
+>> I agree. nano would also be useful. (At least one of those two should be
+>> included.) A few of us still haven't mastered vi. :)
+>>
+>
+> I don't want to start a flamewar or something, but keep in mind that there
+> are several people, pretty much unexperienced with Linux and keyboard
+> shortcuts or combining them. They might be lost or in difficulty if nano is
+> installed on it's own. mc or mcedit isn't too heavy and so easy to use that
+> it would be a good idea, in my opinion, to include it.
+>
+> This is from my own experience. Now, I can manage to learn how to use nano
+> or vi (I use emacs personally), but editing in text console was such a pain
+> when I started using Linux until I found out about mcedit. So...
+>
+> Couldn't it be possible to installed both mcedit (basic) and nano (advanced)
+> then? Its not like if they were heavy...
+
+dual iso is not planned to target unexperienced users.... no
+proprietary drivers, very minimal interface... So even if I can
+understand your explanation it seems to be a bit off topic for this
+iso
+
+>
+
+
+
+-- 
+Anne
+http://www.mageia.org
+