From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110328/003759.html | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110328/003759.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110328/003759.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110328/003759.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110328/003759.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..53875181a --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110328/003759.html @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Tainted Software - once more + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Tainted Software - once more

+ Romain d'Alverny + rdalverny at gmail.com +
+ Mon Mar 28 11:03:51 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:17, Oliver Burger <oliver.bgr at googlemail.com> wrote:
+> What is our policy about "tainted packages"? It's quite clear we have to check
+> every one of them, if they can be distributed by us, but do we have any
+> guidlines?
+
+The guidelines should be progressive: what goes into core, what goes
+into nonfree, what goes into tainted, and the rest (if there is). I
+guess that's what's needed?
+
+As for guidelines regarding tainted, there's this draft relative to sw
+patents that did not make a lot of progress so far:
+http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=software_patents_policy . As a more
+general guideline, I'd suggest to wait at least for this evening
+meeting since we will discuss/clear out the issue regarding
+core/nonfree (and hopefully of their respective inclusion on some of
+our releases ISOs).
+
+Romain
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1