From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110325/003665.html | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110325/003665.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110325/003665.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110325/003665.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110325/003665.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b4ca8bacb --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110325/003665.html @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] qt3-devel needed for Trinitydesktop (KDE 3.5 successor) + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] qt3-devel needed for Trinitydesktop (KDE 3.5 successor)

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Fri Mar 25 11:38:42 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
+
+Quote: nicolas vigier wrote on Fri, 25 March 2011 11:20
+
+> The COMPELLING reason has already been said. It's because we don't
+> want
+> to have software built on a deprecated library in the repository.
+
+That is not a compelling reason as Xavier's post showed for example.
+
+Having a qt3-devel packages does not automatically imply having packages
+based on it in the official repos.
+
+Also is there an official rule somewhere that specifies:
+
+"because we don't want to have software built on a deprecated library in
+the repository"
+
+or is this simply an arbitrary rule that restricts freedoms of users and
+other packagers?
+
+
+In the early days a 'contrib' repo was suggested for not officially
+supported packages (I was for that idea too), this would be a good
+situation where a 'contrib' repo would solve this matter for everyone.
+
+-- 
+Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
+
+ + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1