From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110318/003418.html | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110318/003418.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110318/003418.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110318/003418.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110318/003418.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0bf1e4314 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110318/003418.html @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Seamonkey package + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Seamonkey package

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Fri Mar 18 03:00:24 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 21:05 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
+> Michael Scherer a écrit :
+
+> > So I cannot distribute it by selling a CD, since this would subject the
+> > distribution to a fee.
+> 
+> Only if the CD contained only (or primarily) Mozilla products would I 
+> say that you would reason for concern.  For an officiel Mageia iso, that 
+> would be very far from the case.
+
+So the people ( commercial abusers ) who want to sell Firefox can simply
+say "you can pay to get Mozilla Firefox and Gimp and VLC and Audacity"
+and then say "but that's not primarily Mozilla" and get away with it.
+While maybe this is so simple, I doubt that no one thought of it before.
+
+> > The article of the FSF explicitly list this as a right for free software
+> > users http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html .
+> 
+> That is a provision of unmodified GPL, and not a requirement of all open 
+> source licenses.  In fact, even the FSF admits that not all open source 
+> licenses have this provision.
+
+See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLAllowMoney
+"Yes, the GPL allows everyone to do this. The right to sell copies is
+part of the definition of free software."
+
+> The FSF page
+>   <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses>
+> lists the Xinetd license
+>   <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Xinetd_License>
+> as a free software license which is not compatible with GPL.
+> 
+> Why ?  It cannot be redistributed for a fee.
+
+No, I think you misinterpret this :
+
+"The author (Panagiotis Tsirigotis) grants permission to use, copy,
+and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose 
+and without fee, ..."
+
+That's the granted permission that is offered by the author without fee.
+
+Ie, _I_, as a user or coder, do not pay anything to have the right to
+distribute, use, copy the software and documentation for any purpose. 
+
+Moreover "any purpose" seems to me rather clear, and for me, that also
+mean also "sell it".  
+
+Finally, there is also several examples of licenses that forbid charging
+for distribution :
+* Aladdin Free Public License
+* AT&T Public License, point 7
+* Reciprocal Public License ( first point )
+* Simple Machines License
+* YaST License
+        
+And all of thoses are in the section "Non-Free Software Licenses". 
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1