From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110316/003353.html | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110316/003353.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110316/003353.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110316/003353.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110316/003353.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..44ba292b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110316/003353.html @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Packaging errors to fix + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Packaging errors to fix

+ andre999 + andr55 at laposte.net +
+ Wed Mar 16 06:41:57 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
+>
+> On 15 March 2011 17:35, Michael Scherer<misc at zarb.org>  wrote:
+>>>> I think he is using rpm directly, not urpmi...
+>>>
+>>> Do we really care about fixing all the corner cases in our installation
+>>> of a chroot without urpmi?
+>>
+>> What if people want to use something else than urpmi ?
+>> ( like smartpm, etc ).
+>
+> Well:
+> 1) In a perfect world, every rpm manager would work the same way
+> 2) smart is used on a installed system, with a populated /dev
+> 3) we cannot workaround every possible faillure of every possible
+>      package manager IMHO...
+>
+>>> I'd say we should focus on the ones appearing with urpmi, or the one we
+>>> spot in DrakX logs.
+>>
+>> We could too, but so far, no one gave use lits of errors to fix for
+>> that :)
+>
+> because we're already perfect :-)
+
+and don't let anyone say otherwise :)
+
+-- 
+André
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1