From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003342.html | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003342.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003342.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003342.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003342.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cadaf9093 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003342.html @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Tue Mar 15 20:34:50 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
+
+Quote: Michael Scherer wrote on Tue, 15 March 2011 20:21
+
+> Because some people do not care about patents and using tainted stuff,
+> but do care about free licenses and do care about what it bring to
+> them.
+> 
+> I do. Stormi do ( or seems to do ). And I think that given we decided
+> to
+> split PLF for that precise reason, there is more than 2 of us to care.
+> 
+> > Putting tainted packages in nonfree just causes more confusion
+> > IMHO.
+> 
+> As much as the reverse, it all depends on what you tell to people
+> about
+> the repository, what they expect and what you prefer to highlight. 
+
+That's exactly why I suggested earlier in this thread that we need an
+additional repo for 'tainted+non-free' packages, that's the only solution
+that would satisfy every preference people might have and at the same time
+make things clear for everyone (packagers, mirror maintainers, users).
+
+Putting 'tainted+non-free' packages into 'non-free' is a messy
+unsatisfactory workaround, not a real solution.
+-- 
+Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1