From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003339.html | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003339.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003339.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003339.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003339.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..59ad17d70 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003339.html @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Packaging errors to fix + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Packaging errors to fix

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Tue Mar 15 19:06:28 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Le mardi 15 mars 2011 à 18:34 +0200, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
+> On 15.03.2011 15:38, Michael Scherer wrote:
+> > 3rd : dbus. There is a vicious loop between dbus and its own library,
+> 
+> So? Both of the requires are correct from what I know, and dependency
+> loops are not forbidden.
+> 
+> I can imagine there are also some more clear cases of such loops, like
+> library A depending on B, B on C, and C again on A, which I personally
+> don't believe are in the need of "solving".
+
+We did have some troubles with loops at building time when we
+bootstrapped the distribution, and we clearly wanted to remove them as
+much as possible. 
+
+A loop at runtime is potentially the sign of a loop at build time too.
+So we should try to avoid them IMHO. 
+ 
+In the case of dbus, yes, the requires are correct, but the ordering
+seems wrong during the test. So either there is a bug in what ever jbj
+is running, or we do use Requires(post) in a wrong way, or that's a
+change somewhere. In any case, there is still the others problem to look
+at :)
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1