From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003304.html | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003304.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003304.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003304.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003304.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..47594e834 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003304.html @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Tue Mar 15 01:33:01 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
+
+I was looking at Mandriva non-free SRPM directory since Mageia doesn't have
+much in non-free yet.
+I haven't actually counted if the majority has source or not, so you might
+be right, but we are digressing here because like I said in the first post
+the question here in this thread is about a package that has code with a
+non-free license but is open source (and is 'tainted').
+
+To quote my initial mail:
+"... what the appropriate repository for a package is that's both non-free
+(open source but not a FOSS license) and tainted (contains sw. that is
+covered by patents in some parts of the world)."
+
+To complicate matters further this package will have dependencies to some
+other 'tainted' packages, which also a reason why 'tainted' seems more
+appropiate for this specifica package at least. 
+-- 
+Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1