From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003279.html | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003279.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003279.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003279.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003279.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..02f7147d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003279.html @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?

+ Samuel Verschelde + stormi at laposte.net +
+ Sun Mar 13 21:09:48 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Le dimanche 13 mars 2011 21:01:15, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
+> sön 2011-03-13 klockan 21:55 +0200 skrev Tux99:
+> > During the review with my mentor Anssi of one of the packages I'm working
+> > on, the question came up what the appropriate repository for a package is
+> > that's both non-free (open source but not a FOSS license) and tainted
+> > (contains sw. that is covered by patents in some parts of the world).
+> > 
+> > Should a non-free+tainted package go in tainted, i.e. is the tainted repo
+> > for all tainted packages, both free and non-free
+> 
+> tainted, as thats a "bigger" issue than nonfree
+> 
+> --
+> Thomas
+
+I would have said the opposite, so that using core + tainted you're sure to 
+get free software :)
+
+Samuel
+
+ + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1