From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003277.html | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003277.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003277.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003277.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003277.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4d1a60784 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110313/003277.html @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Sun Mar 13 20:55:59 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
+
+During the review with my mentor Anssi of one of the packages I'm working
+on, the question came up what the appropriate repository for a package is
+that's both non-free (open source but not a FOSS license) and tainted
+(contains sw. that is covered by patents in some parts of the world).
+
+Should a non-free+tainted package go in tainted, i.e. is the tainted repo
+for all tainted packages, both free and non-free
+
+or
+
+should it go into non-free, i.e. non-free is for both unencumbered and
+tainted packages
+
+or
+
+do we need a separate tainted+non-free repository just like plf has?
+
+-- 
+Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
+
+ + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1