From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110304/002978.html | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110304/002978.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110304/002978.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110304/002978.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110304/002978.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..acb0911f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110304/002978.html @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Contributors using real name/working email? or not? or maybe? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Contributors using real name/working email? or not? or maybe?

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Fri Mar 4 19:20:16 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
+
+Quote: Wolfgang Bornath wrote on Fri, 04 March 2011 15:49
+
+> Our mailserver (catering to @mandrivauser.de) does not
+> show such figures. The percentage of our mailserver shows
+> 56.16% accepted, 43.84 rejected. Of these accepted mails
+> our spam filter shows 20% spam (average). Accordingly the
+> server does not waste recognizable power on the mail system.
+> 
+> Maybe with such a setup as yours and such results I may think
+> about changing something, I'd not accept such a situation.
+
+Wobo you completely missread the situation, it's your server setup that
+could still be improved since yours is still accepting spam (which then
+has to be filtered out at a higher cpu cost later on), my server is
+rejecting pratically all spam at the initial SMTP stage, there is nothing
+more efficient than that.
+
+Anyway like you said this is OT here, if you want mail me privately to
+continue this.
+
+-- 
+Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
+
+ + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1