From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002528.html | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002528.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002528.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002528.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002528.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9af0e9eac --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002528.html @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile

+ Thomas Backlund + tmb at iki.fi +
+ Thu Feb 10 23:55:03 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Blinov Vyacheslav skrev 11.2.2011 00:49:
+> В сообщении от Пятница 11 февраля 2011 01:28:47 автор nicolas vigier написал:
+>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Blinov Vyacheslav wrote:
+>>> For a people who are not familiar with disto year/month model is more
+>>> usefull, cause its easier to understand how recent is this version,
+>>> rather then "version 4" that does not talks. If you haven't heard about
+>>> Alt Linux than what can you say about Alt 5? How much time passed since
+>>> it was released?
+>>
+>> And you need to be able to see this information from the release number ?
+>
+> As 4 me, I don't see any difference.
+> I just thought about newcomers.
+> Both naming models have they own benefits to be good, so it just a matter of
+> taste, and my taste tolds me numbering looks nicer  while version number is
+> not about 20.
+
+Well, the downside of using a year as a release number, is that after a 
+year, people will think that the release is old... even if its still 
+supported...
+
+--
+Thomas
+
+
+
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1