[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile

Thu Feb 10 21:32:37 CET 2011

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Maarten Vanraes
+<maarten.vanraes at gmail.com> wrote:
+> Op donderdag 10 februari 2011 19:57:08 schreef Dexter Morgan:
+>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Maarten Vanraes
+>>
+>> <maarten.vanraes at gmail.com> wrote:
+>> > Op donderdag 10 februari 2011 10:34:48 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
+>> >> Le jeudi 10 février 2011 10:15:59, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
+>> >> > On 9 February 2011 21:52,  <root at mageia.org> wrote:
+>> >> > > update version in Makefile
+>> >> > >
+>> >> > > Modified Paths
+>> >> > >
+>> >> > > drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile
+>> >> > >
+>> >> > > Modified: drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile
+>> >> > > ===================================================================
+>> >> > > --- drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile      2011-02-09 20:24:08 UTC
+>> >> > > (rev 495) +++ drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile      2011-02-09
+>> >> > > 20:52:01 UTC (rev 496) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
+>> >> > > -VERSION = 2011.0
+>> >> > > +VERSION = 1
+>> >> > >
+>> >> > >  PRODUCT = drakx-installer-advertising
+>> >> >
+>> >> > I don't know if that has already been discussed somewhere (at least
+>> >> > I didn't remember it), since the "year.month" scheme is widely used
+>> >> > (mandriva, ubuntu, phoronix, ...), why not stick with it?
+>> >> >
+>> >> > on the other hand, "traditionnal" versioning is used by FC, Debian so
+>> >> > I don't have strong opinion about any of these.
+>> >> > WDYT?
+>> >>
+>> >> I saw no public discussion about it (maybe in a meeting for which I
+>> >> didn't read the logs). I like having the year in release version, but I
+>> >> infered from what I saw that version 1 seems to be what has been
+>> >> chosen. However, that may be to late to discuss since the alpha is due
+>> >> in 5 days from now.
+>> >>
+>> >> Samuel
+>> >
+>> > i was under the opinion that people said "Release 1" as a temporary
+>> > measure, until the discussion had been settled...
+>> >
+>> > i too prefer the year in the release, makes it easier to remember.
+>>
+>> i hardly see how this is easier to remember.
+>> I really like the way fedora does F14, F15, ...
+>>
+>>
+>> but this is just my opinion :)
+>
+> well, tbf, will it be ok to have F143 in the future? it seems a bit ...
+> languish ... to me.
+>
+
+and mageia 3501.1 is something better ? :)
+
+come on  you have just personnal feeling here not something with arguments.
+