From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002518.html | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002518.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002518.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002518.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002518.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..95f75c44b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110210/002518.html @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile

+ nicolas vigier + boklm at mars-attacks.org +
+ Thu Feb 10 20:08:11 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
+
+> 
+> I don't know if that has already been discussed somewhere (at least
+> I didn't remember it), since the "year.month" scheme is widely used
+> (mandriva, ubuntu, phoronix, ...), why not stick with it?
+> 
+> on the other hand, "traditionnal" versioning is used by FC, Debian so
+> I don't have strong opinion about any of these.
+> WDYT?
+
+I like "traditionnal" versionning.
+
+Version number was discussed a little in IRC meeting in december, when
+talking about release tags :
+http://meetbot.mageia.org/mageia-meeting/2010/mageia-meeting.2010-12-01-19.37.log.html
+Maybe in other discussions I forgot too.
+
+It has not been discussed a lot. But now it's probably too late to change
+it, now that this release number has been used everywhere.
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1