[Mageia-dev] [Mageia-sysadm] [496] update version in Makefile

Thu Feb 10 19:35:49 CET 2011

Op donderdag 10 februari 2011 10:34:48 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
+> Le jeudi 10 février 2011 10:15:59, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
+> > On 9 February 2011 21:52,  <root at mageia.org> wrote:
+> > > update version in Makefile
+> > > 
+> > > Modified Paths
+> > > 
+> > > drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile
+> > > 
+> > > Modified: drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile
+> > > ===================================================================
+> > > --- drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile	2011-02-09 20:24:08 UTC (rev 495)
+> > > +++ drakx/trunk/advertising/Makefile	2011-02-09 20:52:01 UTC (rev 496)
+> > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
+> > > -VERSION = 2011.0
+> > > +VERSION = 1
+> > > 
+> > >  PRODUCT = drakx-installer-advertising
+> > 
+> > I don't know if that has already been discussed somewhere (at least
+> > I didn't remember it), since the "year.month" scheme is widely used
+> > (mandriva, ubuntu, phoronix, ...), why not stick with it?
+> > 
+> > on the other hand, "traditionnal" versioning is used by FC, Debian so
+> > I don't have strong opinion about any of these.
+> > WDYT?
+> 
+> I saw no public discussion about it (maybe in a meeting for which I didn't
+> read the logs). I like having the year in release version, but I infered
+> from what I saw that version 1 seems to be what has been chosen. However,
+> that may be to late to discuss since the alpha is due in 5 days from now.
+> 
+> Samuel
+
+i was under the opinion that people said "Release 1" as a temporary measure, 
+until the discussion had been settled...
+
+i too prefer the year in the release, makes it easier to remember.
+