From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110120/002272.html | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110120/002272.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110120/002272.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110120/002272.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110120/002272.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a3e6df5e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110120/002272.html @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] On importing /soft + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] On importing /soft

+ Anssi Hannula + anssi.hannula at iki.fi +
+ Thu Jan 20 16:57:06 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On 19.01.2011 22:32, Pascal Terjan wrote:
+> http://svn.mageia.org/soft-cleaning/status.html#monitor-edid
+> says "- README: Some reference to the Mandriva mailing list and
+> bugzilla will need to be changed to Mageia ones"
+> 
+> Do we really want to?
+> What is the point?
+> I think we can package this tool as-is, as a tool provided by Mandriva
+> like if we were packaging a non distro specific tool developed by
+> RedHat or Debian or anyone and let people report their bugs upstream
+> if the README says so.
+> 
+> If someday it becomes unmaintained or for any other reason, we can
+> fork it, but currently I think of it as an external tool and see no
+> reason in importing it into our svn
+> 
+> I did not read the full list but I guess there are other standalone
+> tools that we don't need to fork into our svn.
+> 
+> Opinions?
+
++1 for no-fork for now.
+
+-- 
+Anssi Hannula
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1