From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002183.html | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002183.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002183.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002183.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002183.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3b4a5db25 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002183.html @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?

+ Maarten Vanraes + maarten.vanraes at gmail.com +
+ Sun Jan 16 14:10:10 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Op zondag 16 januari 2011 12:32:24 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
+> Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 11:26:54, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
+> > In data domenica 16 gennaio 2011 00:07:56, Anssi Hannula ha scritto:
+> > > Hi all!
+> > > 
+> > > Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to
+> > > 201100 for the time being, or should we not have one at all?
+> > > 
+> > > Not having it will cause any src.rpms that have any
+> > > "%if %mdkversion < x" to fail to build.
+> > > 
+> > > I'm strongly in favor of having it for compatibility reasons, so that
+> > > most MDV src.rpms keep building on Mageia for the time being, including
+> > > those provided by any 3rd party packagers.
+> > > 
+> > > Not having the macro will cause us to lose that compatibility for very
+> > > little benefit, IMO. It could maybe be removed after several releases,
+> > > but not before.
+> > 
+> > I believe you're right at the moment, now that we're importing things,
+> > but after the very first time, starts becoming nonsense since
+> > i believe we're going to work on our packages distro per distro not
+> > taking every time srpms from mandriva as we're doing now.
+> 
+> Well, it may be a naïve hope, but I thought I could maintain the same spec
+> file for Mandriva and Mageia for my packages. It's not just a matter of
+> importing SRPMS from Mandriva to Mageia.
+> 
+> > > However, it seems blino disagreed with this, and he thinks we should
+> > > not have these macros at all.
+> > 
+> > the good should be to have some common macros the allows us to build
+> > packages form one distro to other. I ported in my rhel 4 and 5 mkrel to
+> > get most compatibility to mandriva specs. But now fedora (hope rhel 6 as
+> > well) uses %dist so why not to use a common point to that macro and
+> > extend compatibility?
+> 
+> OK with that.
+> 
+> Samuel
+
+i'm ok with that as well
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1