From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002180.html | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002180.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002180.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002180.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002180.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cef441ef6 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110116/002180.html @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?

+ Dexter Morgan + dmorganec at gmail.com +
+ Sun Jan 16 10:37:09 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula at iki.fi> wrote:
+> Hi all!
+>
+> Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to
+> 201100 for the time being, or should we not have one at all?
+>
+> Not having it will cause any src.rpms that have any
+> "%if %mdkversion < x" to fail to build.
+>
+> I'm strongly in favor of having it for compatibility reasons, so that
+> most MDV src.rpms keep building on Mageia for the time being, including
+> those provided by any 3rd party packagers.
+>
+> Not having the macro will cause us to lose that compatibility for very
+> little benefit, IMO. It could maybe be removed after several releases,
+> but not before.
+>
+> However, it seems blino disagreed with this, and he thinks we should not
+> have these macros at all.
+>
+> What do other people think?
+>
+> --
+> Anssi Hannula
+>
+
+hi,
+
+i agree with this but if we add one i would be in favor or adding
+later ( after the import, clean ) that allow us to remove unneded part
+of the specs like the lib part. And why not add this macro but after .
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1