From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110110/002054.html | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110110/002054.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110110/002054.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110110/002054.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110110/002054.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..84315a08e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110110/002054.html @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Adding Java-Policy + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Adding Java-Policy

+ Anssi Hannula + anssi.hannula at iki.fi +
+ Mon Jan 10 15:50:16 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On 10.01.2011 16:28, Farfouille wrote:
+> 2) Effective Mandriva Java packaging policy is almost the same as Fedora. Btw Fedora java package policy is up to date and very complete. 
+> It is written under Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/). I was wondering if I can adapt the Fedora policy to Mageia.
+> This is allowed by its licence, but I don't know if it is possible or desirable to attribute some Mageia policy stuff to Fedora. Help on this point is welcome.
+
+Mandriva java packages currently follow Fedora policy closely, so
+adopting the Fedora policy (with small changes like java=>%java,
+ant=>%ant etc) seems like the best course of action, at least for the
+time being.
+
+I don't see any problem with the Fedora policy license.
+
+-- 
+Anssi Hannula
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1