[Mageia-dev] New bugzilla proposal

Thu Jan 6 18:28:27 CET 2011

Le jeudi 06 janvier 2011 à 17:56 +0100, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
+> 2011/1/6 Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org>:
+
+> > For translation, shouldn't it be attached to either a software, a
+> > website, a document than be separate ?
+> 
+> This is more a philosophical question. If translation bugs are filed
+> in a separate category it makes it easy for the translators and normal
+> package section is not clogged by this.
+
+Since we don't handle translation in a vast majority of packages ( as
+they come from upstream ), that would be a upstream bug like any others
+for a rpm packager.
+
+And for the rest, well, the bug be it in documentation, translation, or
+code must follow the same lifecycle, and imho, should be grouper
+logically and we should not duplicate information everywhere, with
+information being "version of the product/components".
+
+> Example: translation bugs could be generally triaged to i18n group if
+> in a separate category. If the translation bug of foo.rpm is in the
+> normal package category trieage team has to read the description to
+> find out that it is not a program/packager bug but a translation but,
+> then hand it to i18n.
+
+It is not i18n goal to triage bugs. That would be duplication in term of
+ressources, in term of setup, etc. And so if people want to sort bugs,
+they can join the proper team. Doing otherwise would bring complexity
+the setup for a relatively low gain IMHO. 
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+