From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008538.html | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008538.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008538.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008538.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008538.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..356954035 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008538.html @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

+ Olav Vitters + olav at vitters.nl +
+ Fri Sep 30 15:00:45 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:33:59PM +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
+> However, how great is GNOME 3.4 going to be as compared to 3.2.2 ? :)
+
+For me it is multiple things:
+1. More stable; The more people use a recent version of GNOME, more
+   fixes will go into GNOME and long term GNOME is more stable
+
+   Basically: if your GNOME version is old, developers spend less time
+   on it, because they assume the issue is probably fixed. So, IMO, to
+   ensure GNOME stays at a high quality, you have to provide a recent
+   version... staying 1 version behind only works for short term (the
+   "Release early, release often" mindset).
+2. Then the 3.4 plans, like: action lists, focus-follows-mouse, better
+   working Documents + Contacts. Noticed some plans for other
+   applications like "Boxes" (1 app which connects to VMs + connect to
+   other machines), gnome-shell extension webapp, etc.
+   This is brief, as the developers are still writing down all their
+   plans. Also, not everything that is planned turns out that way (e.g.
+   I expected Zeitgeist in 3.2).
+
+-- 
+Regards,
+Olav
+
+ + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1