From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008510.html | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008510.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008510.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008510.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008510.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..71e9a0f1b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008510.html @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

+ Thomas Backlund + tmb at mageia.org +
+ Thu Sep 29 21:38:18 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Olav Vitters skrev 29.9.2011 22:22:
+> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:50:57PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
+>> And you can obviously guarantee that the gnome release schedule wont slip...
+>
+> Guarantee, no, but the combined total number of days delayed over the
+> last 5 years or so is probably 1 day. The release cycle is *very*
+> stable.
+>
+
+But as you stated its only a "likely" schedule so far,
+and the https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointThree also states
+
+"! Attention: This schedule is still a draft to discuss."
+
+so I'm not conviced so far, and it also means noe even our final RC 
+would have final gnome packages available, wich means a lot of beta/rc 
+testing wont be done on it... meaning not really a "quality release"
+for Mageia 2.
+
+
+--
+Thomas
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1