From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008262.html | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008262.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008262.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008262.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008262.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ca52d5717 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-September/008262.html @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Faac and building upon faac + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Faac and building upon faac

+ Oliver Burger + oliver.bgr at googlemail.com +
+ Tue Sep 20 12:13:08 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
2011/9/20 Balcaen John <mikala at mageia.org>:
+> Le mardi 20 septembre 2011 06:32:47, Philippe DIDIER a écrit :
+>> Hi !
+>> Since sunday september 18th faac is provided in tainted repos for
+>> mageia1 and cauldron.... after some controversy
+> [..]
+>> What do you think ?
+>>
+>> Philippe
+> Well i even initially imported faac & soon after we removed it initially
+> because of the  patents/license issue.
+> So if it's now ok to import it there's no reason to not build packages against
+> it since we do think it's « safe » enough to have it in our repository.
+>
+I don't know, what changed our mind...
+The patent-/license-situation has not changed as far as I'm informed.
+Actually we would need a repo of its own for faac. Since it can't be
+in nonfree for patent issues and it can't be in tainted because we
+don't have full sources for it.
+
+I know, we already had long discussions about it, I just don't recall
+having found a decision.
+If we have, please excuse me, if we have not, we should do soonest.
+
+Oliver
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1