From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008991.html | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008991.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008991.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008991.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008991.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..99019d55d --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008991.html @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] missing deps, lash rebuilt for texi2html + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] missing deps, lash rebuilt for texi2html

+ Philippe DIDIER + philippedidier at laposte.net +
+ Wed Oct 19 19:15:03 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Funda Wang a écrit :
+> 2011/10/16 Thomas Spuhler <thomas at btspuhler.com>:
+>> Thanks Funda. I will look it up just to learn how you did it.
+> The problem comes from the upgrading of swig, it tends to have such
+> problems when doing major upgrades.
+> 
+
+Does it mean that  packages having "BuildRequires: swig" in the spec
+file, must be rebuilt since swig has been updated ???
+And that lot of them will need patches ? ...
+
+Sophies says that 40 srpms have Builrequires: swig !
+
+Must we ask their maintainers try to rebuild each of them, and look for
+a patch if it can't be rebuilt ?
+
+Must we open a tracker in bugzilla with the list of "packages needing to
+be rebuilt and perhaps patched since swig has been updated " ?
+and open a bug report for each of them ?
+
+
+
+ + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1