[Mageia-dev] missing deps, lash rebuilt for texi2html

Sun Oct 16 16:01:15 CEST 2011

Philippe DIDIER a écrit :
+> Thomas Spuhler a écrit :
+>> On Saturday, October 15, 2011 07:16:19 pm Philippe DIDIER wrote:
+>>> Thomas Spuhler a écrit :
+>>>> I just rebuilt lash. In order to get it built, I had to remove
+>>>> -%{python_sitelib}/*
+>>>> Can someone who uses it please test it?
+>>>
+>>> In the previous build (march)
+>>> python-lash rpm was created
+>>> it could install a directory
+>>> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/
+>>> wich contained 4 files
+>>>   _lash.a
+>>>   _lash.la
+>>>   _lash.so
+>>>   lash.py
+>>>
+>>>
+>>> You said you had to remove -%{python_sitelib}/* in the spec file
+>>> because there was nothing there (so your python-lash rpm seems to be
+>>> empty !)
+>>> If nothing was created in the buildroot (and no file found to be
+>>> packaged) it's perhaps a problem of config : if python was not found
+>>> (configure.ac seems to look for a path to PYTHON 2.3 !!! ) this these 4
+>>> files were not created and there's indeed nothing to install...
+>>>
+>>> Perhaps a problem with the update of python since july ?
+>>>
+>>> Did you get an error message complaining about a missing optional
+>>> dependency (even if that doesn't prevent to "make" what is not optional
+>>>
+>>> : configure seems to allow to make without creating python-lash)
+>>
+>> No, I didn't see any error messages.
+> 
+> 
+> It really looks as if the python path was not found ... (configure looks
+> for python path with this list : python2 python2.5 python2.4 python2.3
+> python2.2 python2.1 python2.0 python1.6 python1.5)
+> The python version in mageia is 2.7 !!!
+> 
+> if no python path is found configure may disable pylash building
+> 
+> You may look in the log and try to find :
+> build_pylash="disabled"
+> It may be disabled without warning !!! as it doesn't prevent from
+> building the other components
+> but when creating the rpm python-lash you have no file to put into it
+> 
+> Suppressing the line :
+> -%{python_sitelib}/*
+> in the spec file hides the symptom and provides an empty and useless rpm
+> 
+> That's my hypothesis but I'm not very able !
+> Maybe you may ask to an old packager !!!
+> 
+> 
+> 
+Funda Wang is our silent guardian angel :
+He just fixed it (and we may see how he could in revision 155500)!
+
+Thanks Funda
+
+
+
+
+