From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008590.html | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008590.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008590.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008590.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008590.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8ec91e36b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008590.html @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

+ Olav Vitters + olav at vitters.nl +
+ Sat Oct 1 21:58:20 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Dexter Morgan wrote:
+> i think 3.4 would be a nice choice ut as told it depends of the
+> schedule. If you think this can be ok,  i trust you.
+
+GNOME schedule wise it is ok, I just don't know what things need to be
+done from a distribution. e.g. iso file size.. we'll need to monitor
+than continuously IMO
+
+> Is it doable to do like mikala for kde and do updates for gnome 3.4.x
+> during mageia lifecycle ?
+
+Yeah, that is mandatory. We have to provide the stable updates. The more
+people use software, the more bugs are found. So we have to provide
+stable updates to fix everything that was found (no matter how much
+testing you do in a group, if you have 50x the amount of users, they'll
+find way more bugs).
+-- 
+Regards,
+Olav
+
+ + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1