From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009612.html | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 147 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009612.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009612.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009612.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009612.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..eed3403ff --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009612.html @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] No boot after installation + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] No boot after installation

+ Maarten Vanraes + alien at rmail.be +
+ Fri Nov 18 14:09:14 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Hello,
+
+Which mageia did you install? mageia1(or mageia2 alfa?) and from what 
+installation medium? livecd/installDVD/netboot?
+
+the best way to give us opportunity is to file a bugreport at 
+http://bugs.mageia.org/ .
+
+furthermore, Scientific linux, does that use grub2 or grub1?
+
+where did you install the grub bootloader on during install? partition or 
+disk?
+
+Op vrijdag 18 november 2011 13:44:33 schreef Michel Catudal:
+> I have encountered this issue when I installed the released mageia. I think
+> I had a similar issue with Ubuntu. No such issue with Fedora, Centos or
+> Scientific Linux.
+> 
+> I have 3 1TB sata hard disks
+> 
+> The first disk has
+> xosl boot loader
+> Free Dos
+> gentoo
+> FC15
+> 
+> The second disk has
+> Mageia
+> Scientific Linux
+> Centos
+> 
+> The third disk has eComStation 3.1 (OS/2 Warp 4.5)
+> 
+> 
+> When I installed it it would give me a boot error. I found out later that
+> grub was not installed properly. The hard disks are installed in the right
+> order.
+> I did notice that xosl sees the reverse order for the 2nd and 3rd disk.
+> When going in fdisk the order is correct.
+> 
+> I then booted mageia using grub in Scientific Linux. I installed grub and
+> it worked after that. I did notice when I tell grub to look for the boot
+> it wrongly identified the drive as being the first one when it is actually
+> the second drive.
+> 
+> I am puzzled because if there is indeed an error on what the bios returns
+> Scientific Linux and Centos would have screwed up too.
+> 
+> 
+> Michel Catudal
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1