From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009594.html | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 140 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009594.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009594.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009594.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009594.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4b3712952 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009594.html @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] (second attempt) suggesting sectool be dropped + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] (second attempt) suggesting sectool be dropped

+ Michael scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Thu Nov 17 11:26:12 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:39:29AM +0100, Florian Hubold wrote:
+> Am 15.11.2011 07:29, schrieb Michael Scherer:
+> > Le lundi 14 novembre 2011 à 22:09 -0800, Robert M. Riches Jr. a écrit :
+> >> (New list subscriber...needed to fix registered email address to post...)
+> >>
+> >> I was asked to submit this suggestion to the mailing list:
+> >>
+> >> As a Mageia user, I believe msec was much better off with_OUT_
+> >> sectool.  In its present state, sectool is BADLY broken.  It
+> >> whines for pages about file permissions that are exactly as they
+> >> should be. 
+> > Can you be more specific ?
+> It think he means this: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2808
+> or https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2255#c21 or
+> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2255#c22
+> 
+> I've also become supportive of this, sectool is basically duplicating
+> partly msec functionality, there was no adaption for Mageia, currently it's
+> checking on Mageia with the upstream Fedora configuration.
+> 
+> Honestly this should have been done when importing it, as
+> tmb already mentioned. msec should be patched to not require it.
+> 
+> When we can't even get our default security tool to work properly,
+> what's the point in adding a second one which needs even more
+> maintenance?
+
+As you say, the question is again "why was it uploaded in the first place".
+It seems some packages were uploaded, and there seemed to have not enough
+tests. While that's hard or impossible to avoid totally, that's not really 
+the way to achieve a good distribution :/
+
+I neither use msec or sectool, so I personnaly do not care that much.
+Afaik, sectool was created by a ex mandriva/mandrake guy ( vincent danen ), 
+because he was ( rightfully ) wanting to rewrite  msec, who is/was 
+a mess of bash + python + perl code ( and rather ugly code, afaik, last time
+I took a look ), but if msec is supported, and sectool is not, then I guess
+we could drop. However, I still think we should first attempt to collaborate
+and fix it. ( ie, always have the reflex of "try to fix and collaborate" ).
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1