From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009545.html | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009545.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009545.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009545.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009545.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..61a24f676 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009545.html @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] HEADSUP: mariadb available for testing + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] HEADSUP: mariadb available for testing

+ Sam Bailey + cyprix at cyprix.com.au +
+ Tue Nov 15 09:42:04 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On 15/11/11 15:08, Sam Bailey wrote:
+> On 11/11/2011 10:17, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
+>
+>> ...
+>> A. provide both but with vendor preference
+>> making sure one of them both is preferred should be ok, since they conflict
+>> anyway, if a user installs the non-preferred one, she knows what she's doing.
+>> ( I think a note could be added here for warning purposes )
+>>
+>> B. only use mariadb anymore
+>> =>  That's the easiest and safest option...
+>> _IF_ mariadb works well. (which i'm sure we'll see in our testing)
+>> (IMHO, if it worked for libreoffice, i don't see why not for mariadb)
+>>
+>>
+>> any opinions? testings? problems?
+>
+> I'm all for either of these. Especially B) if we can test it well enough.
+>
+> I rebuilt the package on mga1 without issues. Tests fine as well.
+>
+> Does anyone have any idea if the PBXT (Primebase) Storage Engine will be
+> kept in MariaDB 5.5 (as it is in 5.1, 5.2, 5.3)?
+>
+> --
+> Sam Bailey
+>
+
+My apologies for the HTML email. Silly me.
+
+-- 
+Sam Bailey
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1