From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009544.html | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009544.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009544.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009544.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009544.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dd5cde93b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009544.html @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2

+ Samuel Verschelde + stormi at laposte.net +
+ Tue Nov 15 09:35:30 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Le mardi 15 novembre 2011 07:40:13, Michael Scherer a écrit :
+> Le lundi 14 novembre 2011 à 19:29 -0300, Balcaen John a écrit :
+> > Le lundi 14 novembre 2011 23:17:32 zezinho a écrit :
+> > > Le lundi 14 novembre 2011 20:23:40, Juan Luis Baptiste a écrit :
+> > > > So what is the final decision about this ? is there going to be an
+> > > > update or not ?
+> > > 
+> > > I vote no, let's wait for backports, like all other new versions.
+> > 
+> > i not agree at all because
+> > 
+> >  - we did it for KDE SC 4.6 (upgrading from 4.6.3 to 4.6.5).
+> >  - the list of bug fixes  (especially the number of crash & corruption
+> >  fix) - it's a *minor* version not a major one
+> 
+> The policy is not about minor version, it is bugfixes only. Not
+> everybody make the distinction between minor and major, especially for
+> software developpers.
+> 
+> And again, the question of QA is here. Since we didn't detect the
+> regression ( and since there is so much crashes to fix, and sine
+> everybody think that's important enough to bypass our policy, according
+> to people in the thread ), how do people plan to make sure the most
+> obvious one are corrected ?
+> 
+> Do we have open bug reports about them, with clear reproducer ?
+> 
+> And do at least someone plan to use kdenlive enough to say "this fixed
+> the bug I have been seeing before" ?
+> 
+> Or do we plan to do "it started, so it is good enough, let's ship it" ?
+
+Of course QA will test more than "the program started, it's OK". If you look 
+at the history of updates in bugzilla you'll see that testing is usually more 
+thorough than that.
+
+And if the packager asks for testing of new features to ensure they introduce 
+no obvious blocking bug, they can be tested, provided they are in a limited 
+number. If that's the price for dozens of bugfixes, it can be worth it, unless 
+the new features are disruptive for users accustomed to the version of 
+kdenlive in core/release, or bring incompatibilities or new critical bugs.
+
+Samuel
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1