From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009435.html | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009435.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009435.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009435.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009435.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..59ce8bba1 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009435.html @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Consolidation of the spelling tools in Mageia + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Consolidation of the spelling tools in Mageia

+ Kamil Rytarowski + n54 at gmx.com +
+ Wed Nov 9 13:03:28 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On 09.11.2011 09:45, peter f miller wrote:
+> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Kamil Rytarowski<n54 at gmx.com>  wrote:
+>> This is my scratch of the project, read for more info
+>> http://www.mandrivauser.de/mga-testwiki/index.php/Overview
+>> http://www.mandrivauser.de/mga-testwiki/index.php/Proposals
+>>
+>> Tell me what do you think?
+> On the Overview wiki, why is ibus-m17n listed as part of ispell? That
+> is part of the ibus IME, right? That is not part of ispell.
+It's grep over our svn repo:
+These lines are
+%post_ibus_register_engine m17n:en:ispell en
+%preun_ibus_unregister_engine m17n:en:ispell
+
+I've check every single package at this *research* stage what does what. 
+I believe if we want to really remove for example ispell then we should 
+clean the whole repo as much as it's needed. If ispell is absent in Mga1 
+and Mdv2010 will lost its support then why for example to provide it by 
+some of aspell packages?
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1