From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009426.html | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009426.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009426.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009426.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009426.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7aea5f594 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-November/009426.html @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2

+ Juan Luis Baptiste + juancho at mageia.org +
+ Wed Nov 9 00:28:14 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
2011/11/7 José Jorge <jjorge at free.fr>:
+> Le lundi 7 novembre 2011 22:13:53, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
+>
+> 6 features introduced in Kdenlive 0.8.2
+>
+> I don't like this idea, because a new version is also new features, and so
+> new bugs. What if we end with a new outstanding bug that is more important
+> than the old crashes? We will have to revert back, using an epoch.
+>
+
+You are only speculating of possible bugs that could appear with these
+new features, but we are talking about 151 *confirmed* bugs, from
+which 44 are crashes that also for sure, will make someone loose their
+work and make him angry at us. Also those 6 new features seem minor
+and more of a cosmetic nature for most of them, I don't think they can
+introduce any serious bug like a crash.
+
+> Yes we are waiting for backports for a long time, but it is upstream
+> responsibility to maintain released versions. They don't do that, so we only
+> should send new ( mlt + kdenlive + openshot) to backports.
+>
+
+Even so backports were open I think that because of the huge amount of
+bug fixes this version should be push as an update instead of a
+backport.
+
+> I feel I know this problem well, as I worked a lot with kdenlive :
+> http://lachuteduneplume.free.fr/?Technical
+>
+> If an update had bumped me to 0.6, my work would have been lost, this is NOT
+> what I expect from an update.
+
+Of course no one expects to loose work, but in your same line of
+thought, actual users of our version of kdenlive also don't expect to
+loose their work because of a crash if there's a fix available and we
+aren't providing it.
+
+Juancho
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1