From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006077.html | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006077.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006077.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006077.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006077.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3db47f7d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006077.html @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal

+ andre999 + andr55 at laposte.net +
+ Tue Jun 28 03:44:53 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Sander Lepik a écrit :
+>
+> 24.06.2011 03:15, Michael Scherer kirjutas:
+
+[ ... ]
+
+> Reading comments here and knowing that our QA team is in trouble already
+> - i don't see how would QA handle backports. I can also see that there
+> might come time when backports are unpatched and thus unsecure.
+
+The idea is to use the packager and backport requesters to test the backports, in place 
+of the QA team.  This is considered adequate since backports would be "leaf" packages 
+(on which no other package is dependant), and so the packages need only be tested to 
+ensure that they work.
+Of course for security issues, we have to be a little more careful.
+
+> --
+> Sander
+>
+
+-- 
+André
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1