From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006029.html | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006029.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006029.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006029.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006029.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6ecf61a2d --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006029.html @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Proposal of a backporting process + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Proposal of a backporting process

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Sun Jun 26 11:35:53 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 à 10:57 +0200, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
+> Op zondag 26 juni 2011 00:16:59 schreef Michael Scherer:
+> [...]
+> > > we
+> > > always say that backports should mainly be cherry picked, but not
+> > > enabled all the time... so how does installing a new version of e.g.
+> > > wine break the user's system when he can easily back out that rpm?
+> > 
+> > I a not sure that most people realize they can revert. Maybe a easier
+> > interface to do that could be offered ( along maybe with a tool that
+> > send feedback on why it did downgrade it ? ).
+> 
+> that's not a bad idea, what is the best way to revert? is that with --old-
+> package ?
+
+urpme package; urpmi package
+
+> what if the package has been removed on mirrors? (ie: due to more recent 
+> updates)
+
+Let me complete my proposal : 'revert to the version in release'.
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1