From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006005.html | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 122 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006005.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006005.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006005.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006005.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..21b3c161b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006005.html @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Backports policy proposal + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Backports policy proposal

+ Angelo Naselli + anaselli at linux.it +
+ Sat Jun 25 15:07:23 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
In data venerdì 24 giugno 2011 08:30:15, Maarten Vanraes ha scritto:
+> Op vrijdag 24 juni 2011 02:10:14 schreef Michael Scherer:
+> [...]
+> 
+> > Another rule that we could add is that cauldron should always be newer
+> > than backports, in order to ensure upgradability. The same goes for n-2
+> > and n-1 release.
+> > While this seems innocent, do not forget this will have a impact when we
+> > do the version freeze.
+> 
+> [..]
+> 
+> This seems hard to enforce... i can imagine if you make backport, it has
+> essentially the same version as in cauldron, i can think that there is a
+> few spec file changes that are only for backports, and thus the release
+> becomes newer than the one in cauldron
+I'm confused :/
+%mkrel was born to avoid that.... am i worng?
+
+-- 
+	Angelo
+-------------- next part --------------
+A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
+Name: not available
+Type: application/pgp-signature
+Size: 198 bytes
+Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
+URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20110625/ed6c9779/attachment.asc>
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1