From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005965.html | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005965.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005965.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005965.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005965.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dfb9d9211 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005965.html @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Firefox 5 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Firefox 5

+ Ahmad Samir + ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com +
+ Thu Jun 23 22:44:51 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On 23 June 2011 22:12, Dexter Morgan <dmorganec at gmail.com> wrote:
+> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Ahmad Samir <ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com> wrote:
+>>>
+>>> yes it needs to go to backports_testing before iirc
+>>>
+>>
+>> Got a link to a thread on -dev ML / irc meeting log / <insert your
+>> favourite communication method here>, where this was decided?
+>>
+>
+> i told iirc so this is something i recall not something i tell it must be done.
+>
+> i think the most important part of my sentence is the last part but
+> maybe you didn't read it ...
+>
+
+I did read it, however my question wasn't only about firefox, but
+rather about the backports policy in general, since your "yes it needs
+to go to backports_testing before iirc" wasn't about firefox only, was
+it? :)
+
+>>> But i think sec team need to speak of FF5 first because i think this
+>>> will be a candidate for updates regarding new firefox upstream policy
+>>>
+>>
+>>
+>>
+>> --
+>> Ahmad Samir
+>>
+>
+
+
+
+-- 
+Ahmad Samir
+
+ + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1