From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005925.html | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005925.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005925.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005925.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005925.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..24681dab0 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005925.html @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Update of mesa to git version + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Update of mesa to git version

+ Christiaan Welvaart + cjw at daneel.dyndns.org +
+ Wed Jun 22 20:54:26 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, andre999 wrote:
+
+> Philippe DIDIER a écrit :
+>> 
+>>> I also disable the mesa glut build in the same change since (if i'm
+>>> not wrong)
+>>> we're supposed to move to freeglut instead.
+>> 
+>> 
+>> Thierry Vignaud is certainly the one that is aware about freeglut versus
+>> GLUT ! He is the one that may say if you are right or wrong to do so now !
+>> 
+>> Beware of the fact that freeglut is not a buildrequire nor a require for
+>> some rpms (their spec file need to be modified
+>> and they need to be rebuilt with freeglut instead of mesaglut)
+
+> Just a question ...
+> what would happen if freeglut has a provides glut ?
+> If neither were installed, wouldn't one be given the option ? (as long as 
+> both are available in the repos) (as one sees often enough when installing 
+> packages)
+> And if both glut and freeglut were installed, and glut were subsequently 
+> uninstalled, would packages requiring glut continue to work ?
+
+Freeglut (libfreeglut3) can already replace mesaglut (libmesaglut3).
+
+
+     Christiaan
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1