From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005487.html | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 179 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005487.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005487.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005487.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005487.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..35d81f63e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005487.html @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion

+ David Sjölin + david.sjolin at gmail.com +
+ Mon Jun 13 13:46:32 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Thorsten van Lil <tvl83 at gmx.de> wrote:
+> Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2011, 22:46:33 schrieb Michael Scherer:
+>> Proposal 1:
+>> 6 months release cycle -> 12 months life cycle
+>> ( Fedora, Ubuntu, Mandriva < 2010.1 && Mandriva != 2006.0 )
+>>
+>> Proposal 2:
+>> 9 months release cycle -> 18 months life cycle
+>> ( ~ opensuse and the one we used for Mageia 1 )
+>>
+>> Proposal 3:
+>> 12 months release cycle -> 24 months life cycle
+>> ( Mandriva > 2010.1 )
+
+Hello!
+
+I'm for proposal 2 as well. I usually use LTS of Ubuntu at work, and
+at home just keep the distribution for a long time, so I would like
+far between, but I know a lot of colleagues who always install the
+latest so the middle ground of 9 months seems good to me.
+
+Regards,
+
+David
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1