From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005465.html | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 181 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005465.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005465.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005465.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005465.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0b4143b91 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005465.html @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion

+ Andres Kaaber + andres.kaaber at gmail.com +
+ Mon Jun 13 09:19:59 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
...
+I wold go for the 9 mo cycle (most probably I will use cauldron for
+myself ;) ) 9 mo release gives enoug time for developers and its not
+so long time (for me, my wifes pregnancy went so quckly :) ) and for
+users with a need for a longer support LTS. I dont remember who said
+it but I liked the idea that we decide wich release will be LTS.
+Another thing ... for me A new "release" devides into two. First -
+upgraded software, KDE, GNOME, LibO, kernel etc. software that is not
+made by Mageia developers and second software that is made by Mageia
+developers drak* etc. For me the real value of distro comes from these
+tools wich are made by distro developers. There where lots of Mandriva
+releases with no noticeable changes in Mandriva tools. So the 9 mo
+release will give more time to make better / bugfree distro specific
+tools.
+
+-- 
+A. Kaaber
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1