From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005338.html | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 158 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005338.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005338.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005338.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005338.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..30fa4e674 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005338.html @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3

+ Wolfgang Bornath + molch.b at googlemail.com +
+ Fri Jun 10 13:55:40 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
2011/6/10 Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org>:
+> Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 10:49 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
+>> 'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 09/06/11 10:25 did gyre and gimble:
+>> > 2011/6/9 JA Magallón <jamagallon at ono.com>:
+>> >>
+>> >> No need, Cauldron is Cauldron. The only strange thing is that I had
+>> >> heard on other threads that update to Gnome 3 was being discussed,
+>> >> but never realized it had finally agreed on.
+>> >
+>> > Same here, I'm a bit surprised.
+>>
+>> We're on the next cycle now. Quite frankly I'd be stunned (and hugely
+>> disappointed) if we *didn't* have Gnome 3!
+>
+> While I have no issue with gnome-shell, I have read enough reports of
+> people not happy with it to know we would head to a 2nd kde 4.0 story.
+> So maybe we could start to learn from the past and discuss with users to
+> explain the update, see why they do not want etc, instead of being
+> purely focused on "it is cauldron, let's update everything".
+
+I do have a problem with gnome-shell, that is my individual opinion.
+But I also read a lot of discussions among Gnome users where the new
+way of Gnome seems to split the community much more than the KDE3.5 to
+KDE4 change. This has been said already way back when we started to
+get the first requests for Gnome3 in Mageia1. Since that time we
+always told the users that implementing Gnome3 will be subject to
+discussion after the Mageia 1 release.
+
+So I was a bit surprised that this was done kind of automagically
+without any discussion.
+
+Besides this I agree to Michael's suggestion.
+
+-- 
+wobo
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1