From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005257.html | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 197 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005257.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005257.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005257.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005257.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..20ac0901b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005257.html @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Missing packages in Mageia 1. How to backport? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Missing packages in Mageia 1. How to backport?

+ Colin Guthrie + mageia at colin.guthr.ie +
+ Thu Jun 9 11:54:27 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 09/06/11 10:40 did gyre and
+gimble:
+> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
+> 
+>> otoh, perhaps a missing package is also a bugfix... maybe we could
+>> file bug
+>> reports for missing packages and go through the updates route...
+> 
+> Filing bug reports is not a bad idea, even if the new package will go to
+> backports. Just explain a little why it is important (to fix this in a
+> stable release).
+> 
+> We probably need a new "version" in bugzilla because mga1+backports is
+> basically a new distro. A bug in backports shouldn't be filed against
+> "1" IMHO.
+
+As I said in my original mail I really don't think backports is the
+right approach.
+
+I'd prefer to have a 3rd party repo than abuse backports to get the
+missing packages.
+
+I think updates would be the right place.
+
+Perhaps we can make the submission process check to see if there already
+exists a package and if not, allow packagers to submit directly to
+core/updates? That way the first version of the package will make it to
+updates but subsequent changes will have to go via QA?
+
+While the "oops I messed up the first version" problem could happen, it
+would at least keep the burden on the packager for the majority of cases
+which is how we want it (from my understanding of the previous messages
+on this thread).
+
+Col
+
+-- 
+
+Colin Guthrie
+mageia(at)colin.guthr.ie
+http://colin.guthr.ie/
+
+Day Job:
+  Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/]
+Open Source:
+  Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/]
+  PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/]
+  Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1