From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007119.html | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007119.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007119.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007119.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007119.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7b7b99751 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007119.html @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Updates and 0 release + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Updates and 0 release

+ Samuel Verschelde + stormi at laposte.net +
+ Fri Jul 29 22:16:26 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Le jeudi 28 juillet 2011 10:08:44, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
+> Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 22:52:00, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
+> > Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 16:59:37, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
+> > > 
+> > > Ok, there will be no meeting tonight, so let's decide it on the ML. Was
+> > > everyone convinced by misc's demonstration and do we agree to stop
+> > > using the 0 release for updates and activate the
+> > > Youri::Submit::Test::Precedence check on submit to prevent higher
+> > > releases in mageia n than in mageia n+1 ?
+> > > 
+> > > And if yes do we use subrels for subsequent modifications of packages
+> > > that are proper to the mageia 1 branch ?
+> > > 
+> > > I vote yes for both questions.
+> > > 
+> > > Samuel
+> > 
+> > Just to make things clear, contrarily as what was said in some of the
+> > previous mails, I was told on IRC by misc and dmorgan that we should
+> > always use subrels for updates.
+> > 
+> > So this means that, when pushing foo-2-1.mga2 from cauldron to 1/updates,
+> > it will become foo-2-1.1.mga1 and not foo-2-1.mga1
+> > 
+> > It means also that you will have to bump the release in cauldron in order
+> > to be allowed to submit the update, in that case. But as misc said, it
+> > should not happen very often :
+> > - providing new versions as updates should remain an exception per
+> > updates policy
+> > - if the package in cauldron already has a release > 1, no need to bump
+> > it
+> > 
+> > Hope it's clear.
+> > 
+> > Best regards
+> > 
+> > Samuel Verschelde
+> 
+> We have updates blocked by this release 0 issue, so we need a quick
+> decision. I propose that if tomorrow nobody reacted against the proposal,
+> it will be adopted.
+> 
+> Best regards
+> 
+> Samuel
+
+As promised, I'm going to update the updates policy regarding release and to 
+fix the release for updates currently staging in updates_testing when they need 
+to.
+
+Best regards
+
+Samuel Verschelde
+
+ + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1