From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007074.html | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007074.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007074.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007074.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007074.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..24309b4d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/007074.html @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Updates and 0 release + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Updates and 0 release

+ Samuel Verschelde + stormi at laposte.net +
+ Wed Jul 27 17:08:00 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 17:04:33, Sander Lepik a écrit :
+> 27.07.2011 17:59, Samuel Verschelde kirjutas:
+> > Ok, there will be no meeting tonight, so let's decide it on the ML. Was
+> > everyone convinced by misc's demonstration and do we agree to stop using
+> > the 0 release for updates and activate the
+> > Youri::Submit::Test::Precedence check on submit to prevent higher
+> > releases in mageia n than in mageia n+1 ?
+> > 
+> > And if yes do we use subrels for subsequent modifications of packages
+> > that are proper to the mageia 1 branch ?
+> > 
+> > I vote yes for both questions.
+> > 
+> > Samuel
+> 
+> If it's documented in policy (better with examples) i'm OK with it. Without
+> policy there will be nothing to follow.
+> 
+
+Of course, once decided, it will be written :)
+
+Samuel
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1